 |
 |
|
|
 |
| < |
November 2024 |
> |
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| | | | |
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
| Matches | |
| Total |
680 |
| Wins |
573 (84.26%) |
| Draws |
50 (7.35%) |
| Losses |
57 (8.38%) |
| Caps Made |
110261 |
| Caps Against |
31948 |
| Highest |
680:70 vs [LoG]
|
| Streaks | |
| Current |
50
|
| Winning |
50
|
| Losing |
3
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
Random Quote
[00:18] [al3x] do u have those turkish d00ds in england?
|
|
| |
| .:: =BC= vs [r@ts] ::. |
| Date |
26 Jun 2003 @ 20:00 |
| Opponent |
[r@ts] |
| League |
ETFCL |
| First Map |
20:40 ( 2Fort ) |
| Second Map |
80:20 ( Oppose2k1 ) |
| Outcome |
Draw / 100:60 |
| Motm |
saltz |
| Demos |
No Demos |
|
| Afx posted at 26 Jun 2003 @ 21:42:20 |
Ohmy....Our performance on offy on 2fort was absolutely a b y s m a l, Not to take too much away from the r@ts defence though who played really well and covered each others positions excellently.
Defence wasnt much better either tbh, however after a bad 10 minutes or so at the beginning they settled down and and dealt with r@ts attacks a lot better.
Back to our home server for op2k1 and i was pretty confident we could level the game on this and i was thankfully proved right :)
We shuffled team around a bit for this with Nar moving back to offence and it worked a treat with us getting plenty of movement and caps.
Defence was also fairly solid with only a couple of lapses.
Anyway cba to say much more other than gg r@ts |
|
|
|
|