• News
  • Members
  • Results
  • Upcoming
  • Demos
  • Awards
  • Forum
  • Preferences
  • Login
  • <
    November 2024
    >
    S M T W T F S
    1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30

    TF2 is good
      Yes
      No
     
    Results | View All | Comments
    Matches 
    Total 680
    Wins 573 (84.26%)
    Draws 50 (7.35%)
    Losses 57 (8.38%)
    Caps Made 110261
    Caps Against   31948
    Highest   680:70 vs [LoG]

    Streaks 
    Current 50
    Winning 50
    Losing 3
     
    Random Quote
    [22:00] [Turgid-Away] awww man, weve just had an imprompyu farting comp in some1s room on my block[22:01] [Turgid-Away] im all 'gassed out'
     
                       ETAC ban anyone?
    The European TeamFortress Admin Council has decided to ban yours truly.
    The ban states that the #bc2 log shows information to me using interp(read: interp, no value specified) one map versus the clan BAD on 11-5-2003 (reference: http://www.body-count.org/results.php?action=details&warid=666 ). The ban also states that I admitted to using interp. So to sum it up: My entire ban happened on IRC/forums, without any TFC coming in the picture.

    Golden boy from Belgium, Fuse!

    Here is where the story starts. A player/admin whom I?ve not had much contact with, and vice versa. What I do know is that he always had a grudge for my former clan UE. This on itself proves nothing of course, but it shows there?s a history here.

    Damn BAD lost again!

    The #bc2 logs were released! Of course good reading for most people. This was also the case for Fuse. But what did the logs show? Eagle & Mick interped against BAD. Mind you, Fuse was in BAD at that time, so that takes care of his impartial status.
    But what appears to be the case? None other than Fuse started the ETAC thread/discussion to ban me.

    Twisted Truth

    As soon as I heard this was the case, I contacted Fuse on IRC. The first thing I said was this: ?ik ga nie ontkennen dat ik interp 1 helft gebruikt heb zeker niet.? Translated: ?I am not going to deny that I used interp for 1 half for sure? (this sentence is a bit twisted, you can interpret it in more ways, Dutch and English.) Clearly Fuse interpreted this sentence as an admittance.
    This was not the case though, I merely said that so the conversation would not be about that (I also explained to Fuse why I said ?interp for 1 half,? it was to make sure we were on the same page about it.)

    Ehm Eagle? SO?

    What we?ve got here is an IRC log from BladeSpirit who was kicked from/left BC, and a so called admittance to a not so very impartial admin. Got credibility?
    Did ETAC think about this? About how that would look, about how solid their case would be? Apparently not. ETAC is supposed to be an impartial ?admin council,? yet the only one I talked to was Fuse.

    Wrap it up, will you

    A lot of what I wanted/want to say has not been said yet. But making this to long of a story will not benefit anyone. To conclude this then: I want to say that I haven?t used interp since default was mandatory. EVEN though it is designed to compensate for packet loss(you will not know until you?ve played with this connection yourself.) I am not judging ETAC for bringing in a default interp rule, I am judging them for how they went about this case. If you see how hard it was for pilsy to get banned due to lack of evidence, and how easy I am banned? Please?? I am not looking for an unban either (where it is fair, but would harm credibility of ETAC.) I would like to see some support though from people, just to know that I?ve been heard.

    Thanks for your interest,

    Eagle
          Comments: 100 | Views: 292504 | Unlock

    Comments

    Rog at 30.07.2003 (12:19:17) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    NOW it works!

    Only asking because Im very bored at work! Seems a bit off to ban without actual TFC based evidence. Eg officer I did 40 in a 30 zone - give me a ticket.

    Anyhow - any chance or pasting the relevant section of the log?


    Rog at 30.07.2003 (12:20:51) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    Comments dont like apostrophes?


    SpankyFart at 30.07.2003 (12:36:06) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    very thin ban, but he...


    USCMR.Bows at 30.07.2003 (12:42:39) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    Bit gay really, as I said on the f2c post - especially if you were not contacted by another admin at all, even after you "admitted" using interp to FuSe.

    Unfortunately, ETAC, like everyone else, are human and make mistakes. This would appear to be one of them (certainly in the way the case was resolved, as for the outcome - who knows).

    ul Eagle.


    MITHEK at 30.07.2003 (13:30:27) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    Flinke schijterij vogeltje. Weird kind of reliable proof this


    -M- at 30.07.2003 (13:49:57) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    tjakka lol


    Chief at 30.07.2003 (14:02:35) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    Stupid kanker website


    Earl at 30.07.2003 (14:06:05) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    lol how fucking pathetic... Mata told me about this, I knew fuse is a blatant idiot, but this reaches human limits.

    What could I say... Fuse cannot even count (cf his whinne at last ECTFC, believing belgium was first, he may need to buy some calculator to add 100 and 50), he FUCKING CANNOT BE FAIR, and he dares ban someone without refering to other admins and relying only on a log spread by BS ?

    And i did not know that guy was the leader of etac...

    Pathetic...


    ocs18 at 30.07.2003 (14:10:38) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    its only a 4 week ban


    saltz at 30.07.2003 (14:31:18) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    Its only a 4 week ban with ETFCL about to resume...

    Besides, the length of the ban is irrelevant, the fact he has been banned from irc logs and NOTHING from any anti-cheat software, nothing from demos, just irc logs; is the issue as far as Im concerned.


    < | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | >
    Username
    Content
     :)   :)   :)   :)   :) 
     :)   :)   :)   :)   :) 
     :)   :)   :)   :)   :) 
       
    [ Information about UBB Codes ]

    <<  Back to News