 |
 |
|
|
 |
| < |
November 2024 |
> |
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| | | | |
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
| Matches | |
| Total |
680 |
| Wins |
573 (84.26%) |
| Draws |
50 (7.35%) |
| Losses |
57 (8.38%) |
| Caps Made |
110261 |
| Caps Against |
31948 |
| Highest |
680:70 vs [LoG]
|
| Streaks | |
| Current |
50
|
| Winning |
50
|
| Losing |
3
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
Random Quote
14(@disa14): a mackem is someone with arms longer than there legs
|
|
| |
| ETAC ban anyone? |
The European TeamFortress Admin Council has decided to ban yours truly.
The ban states that the #bc2 log shows information to me using interp(read: interp, no value specified) one map versus the clan BAD on 11-5-2003 (reference: http://www.body-count.org/results.php?action=details&warid=666 ). The ban also states that I admitted to using interp. So to sum it up: My entire ban happened on IRC/forums, without any TFC coming in the picture.
Golden boy from Belgium, Fuse!
Here is where the story starts. A player/admin whom I?ve not had much contact with, and vice versa. What I do know is that he always had a grudge for my former clan UE. This on itself proves nothing of course, but it shows there?s a history here.
Damn BAD lost again!
The #bc2 logs were released! Of course good reading for most people. This was also the case for Fuse. But what did the logs show? Eagle & Mick interped against BAD. Mind you, Fuse was in BAD at that time, so that takes care of his impartial status.
But what appears to be the case? None other than Fuse started the ETAC thread/discussion to ban me.
Twisted Truth
As soon as I heard this was the case, I contacted Fuse on IRC. The first thing I said was this: ?ik ga nie ontkennen dat ik interp 1 helft gebruikt heb zeker niet.? Translated: ?I am not going to deny that I used interp for 1 half for sure? (this sentence is a bit twisted, you can interpret it in more ways, Dutch and English.) Clearly Fuse interpreted this sentence as an admittance.
This was not the case though, I merely said that so the conversation would not be about that (I also explained to Fuse why I said ?interp for 1 half,? it was to make sure we were on the same page about it.)
Ehm Eagle? SO?
What we?ve got here is an IRC log from BladeSpirit who was kicked from/left BC, and a so called admittance to a not so very impartial admin. Got credibility?
Did ETAC think about this? About how that would look, about how solid their case would be? Apparently not. ETAC is supposed to be an impartial ?admin council,? yet the only one I talked to was Fuse.
Wrap it up, will you
A lot of what I wanted/want to say has not been said yet. But making this to long of a story will not benefit anyone. To conclude this then: I want to say that I haven?t used interp since default was mandatory. EVEN though it is designed to compensate for packet loss(you will not know until you?ve played with this connection yourself.) I am not judging ETAC for bringing in a default interp rule, I am judging them for how they went about this case. If you see how hard it was for pilsy to get banned due to lack of evidence, and how easy I am banned? Please?? I am not looking for an unban either (where it is fair, but would harm credibility of ETAC.) I would like to see some support though from people, just to know that I?ve been heard.
Thanks for your interest,
Eagle
|
| Comments: 100 | Views: 292711 | Unlock
|
Comments
|
|
[14:45] <Eagle> de verkregen informatie was hier zo ie zo illegaal :p
--
je mag ALTIJD de documenten gebruiken van iemand anders als ze in hun nadeel zijn |
|
|
| oh no zil there is no demo, he is banned on irc logs alone. |
|
|
| Good call Fusie imo, this one time I said I had a 12 inch dick on irc, and there was this girl listening, and she wanted to go with me just on irc chat alone! |
|
|
| OK OK I lied, girls dont exsist on irc :( |
|
|
i dont care what happened.. but if you use interp you should be banned...
doesnt mather if you are a div4 of prem player.. suffer dude, a div4 dude would have gone thru the same |
|
|
lol mir x;
from what i can gather...
eagles ban was NOT based on irc the irc evidence as that would have been alittle naive but apparently its based on a confession that Eagle and Afx have made that they have denied? Therefore evidence to ban is fuckall basically? |
|
|
unbelieveable...
how stupid can this shit get |
|
|
Well I just typed out a longish reply but site ate it ;/
So a shortened version, stig two of the three pieces of evidence have been discarded, leaving just the irc logs. So yes, the ban IS on irc logs alone.
Zero, get a clue or shut up. |
< | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | >
[ Information about UBB Codes ]
<< Back to News
|
|
|
|