• News
  • Members
  • Results
  • Upcoming
  • Demos
  • Awards
  • Forum
  • Preferences
  • Login
  • <
    November 2024
    >
    S M T W T F S
    1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30

    TF2 is good
      Yes
      No
     
    Results | View All | Comments
    Matches 
    Total 680
    Wins 573 (84.26%)
    Draws 50 (7.35%)
    Losses 57 (8.38%)
    Caps Made 110261
    Caps Against   31948
    Highest   680:70 vs [LoG]

    Streaks 
    Current 50
    Winning 50
    Losing 3
     
    Random Quote
    [17:38] [Life] i dont believe how newbies dare to take my place on a public server
     
                       ETAC ban anyone?
    The European TeamFortress Admin Council has decided to ban yours truly.
    The ban states that the #bc2 log shows information to me using interp(read: interp, no value specified) one map versus the clan BAD on 11-5-2003 (reference: http://www.body-count.org/results.php?action=details&warid=666 ). The ban also states that I admitted to using interp. So to sum it up: My entire ban happened on IRC/forums, without any TFC coming in the picture.

    Golden boy from Belgium, Fuse!

    Here is where the story starts. A player/admin whom I?ve not had much contact with, and vice versa. What I do know is that he always had a grudge for my former clan UE. This on itself proves nothing of course, but it shows there?s a history here.

    Damn BAD lost again!

    The #bc2 logs were released! Of course good reading for most people. This was also the case for Fuse. But what did the logs show? Eagle & Mick interped against BAD. Mind you, Fuse was in BAD at that time, so that takes care of his impartial status.
    But what appears to be the case? None other than Fuse started the ETAC thread/discussion to ban me.

    Twisted Truth

    As soon as I heard this was the case, I contacted Fuse on IRC. The first thing I said was this: ?ik ga nie ontkennen dat ik interp 1 helft gebruikt heb zeker niet.? Translated: ?I am not going to deny that I used interp for 1 half for sure? (this sentence is a bit twisted, you can interpret it in more ways, Dutch and English.) Clearly Fuse interpreted this sentence as an admittance.
    This was not the case though, I merely said that so the conversation would not be about that (I also explained to Fuse why I said ?interp for 1 half,? it was to make sure we were on the same page about it.)

    Ehm Eagle? SO?

    What we?ve got here is an IRC log from BladeSpirit who was kicked from/left BC, and a so called admittance to a not so very impartial admin. Got credibility?
    Did ETAC think about this? About how that would look, about how solid their case would be? Apparently not. ETAC is supposed to be an impartial ?admin council,? yet the only one I talked to was Fuse.

    Wrap it up, will you

    A lot of what I wanted/want to say has not been said yet. But making this to long of a story will not benefit anyone. To conclude this then: I want to say that I haven?t used interp since default was mandatory. EVEN though it is designed to compensate for packet loss(you will not know until you?ve played with this connection yourself.) I am not judging ETAC for bringing in a default interp rule, I am judging them for how they went about this case. If you see how hard it was for pilsy to get banned due to lack of evidence, and how easy I am banned? Please?? I am not looking for an unban either (where it is fair, but would harm credibility of ETAC.) I would like to see some support though from people, just to know that I?ve been heard.

    Thanks for your interest,

    Eagle
          Comments: 100 | Views: 292468 | Unlock

    Comments

    Nig at 31.07.2003 (21:39:16) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    would probably be easier if u could trust everyone in your private channel not to leak them ?


    Mercutio at 31.07.2003 (23:50:01) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    Seeing as bs dccd the logs in irc 3months after he was kicked and had been in bc 3yrs+ trust didnt really come into it


    aCcReDe at 01.08.2003 (00:26:54) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    was this match where Eagle supposedly used interp for one half played before or after interp was banned?
    if it was played before interp ban then the ban is ridiculous.
    if it was played after interp was banned then this is a fair judgement by etac imo.


    Stab at 01.08.2003 (00:41:02) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    Ha, this is all a bad INTERPretation of using hax INPERP :P

    Sorry if this has aready been pointed out :E


    AphexTwin at 01.08.2003 (00:41:58) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    oh my ;/


    Unzy at 01.08.2003 (01:22:12) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    Quote :

    The first thing I said was this: ik ga nie ontkennen dat ik interp 1 helft gebruikt heb zeker niet. Translated: I am not going to deny that I used interp for 1 half for sure

    Im sorry, but with all the will of the world ... thats a pretty damn clear admitance.

    It doesnt matter anymore then that youve been backstabbed by an ex clanmember, or that it is JUST a log or that you have been caught with your pants down... It was just a very stupid thing to say and its not that BC is gonna drop now to div3 clanplay or gonna lose everything, Its cool to see o0gzs clanmembers are sticking up for him, i would do the same, but i also understand the decision of the ETAC admins.

    Peace

    /note to self : always copy what you have posted here , because some stupid SQL error eats your posts


    OK-enora at 01.08.2003 (02:44:37) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    Shitty ban if there ever was one :/ be nice if some of the haxors were caught in game rather than starting to patrol IRC logs :( maybe its cos theres not one working anti-cheat that can catch anything anymore ? short on in game detections.......??


    Earl at 01.08.2003 (06:27:28) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    ETAC plugin is not logging anything ?


    Ninja at 01.08.2003 (08:43:12) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete
    the ban and how its given is a bit occurd but none the less effective

    and Mata, if u got a problem, might wanna keep the swearing-admins for yourself as u can get punishments on abusive language also, so stfu homoboy wtf u think u are egotrippa


    DanS at 01.08.2003 (09:27:06) Quote | IP Logged | Edit | Delete

    Quote
    might wanna keep the swearing-admins for yourself as u can get punishments on abusive language also, so shut the fuck up homoboy what the fuck u think u are egotrippa



    lol thats a joke right?


    < | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | >
    Username
    Content
     :)   :)   :)   :)   :) 
     :)   :)   :)   :)   :) 
     :)   :)   :)   :)   :) 
       
    [ Information about UBB Codes ]

    <<  Back to News